On 4/16/13, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16/04/13 17:17, Olemis Lang wrote: [...] >> right now it's incredibly important for us to attract user interest >> than dealing with «non-significant» spamming threats . >> > > It is impossible to know whether the non-significance of spam threats is > a result of the current policy.
It's good that you mention that . I'll clarify my statement . Even if our time will be wasted , it will always be possible to remove different kinds of spam . It will be much harder to make interested parties return after giving up because of the disappointing interaction with the site ... and we should focus on fostering user interest on Bloodhound . That's top priority now. Should spam become a serious issue then we apply further measures . That's what I meant . Notice that «non-significant» word is highlighted ;) [...] > > I think I have already mentioned that I am not a fan of capchas but that > is just me and clearly I will not have to be dealing with it! > /me neither . If you ask me I suggest granting read only access to anonymous user . -- Regards, Olemis.
