Searching for links that point to resources in the current project,
should already work. There was a bug with links in default product
that I just fixed in r1470615. If the functionality still does not
work for you, please let me know and I will look into it.


Anze

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22/04/13 11:03, Apache Bloodhound wrote:
>>
>> #450: TracLinks for BloodhoundSeach plugin - after #390
>>
>> -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>>    Reporter:  olemis      |      Owner:  nobody
>>        Type:  task        |     Status:  new
>>    Priority:  major       |  Milestone:
>>   Component:  search      |    Version:
>> Resolution:              |   Keywords:  search TracLinks bep-0004
>>                           |  bep-0004-stable
>>
>> -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Comment (by jdreimann):
>>
>>   I believe this local/global scope change of the search will prove
>>   confusing and annoying to the average user. Search should always remain
>>   global in scope.
>>
>>   Our MultiProduct equivalent to TracLinks should require stating the
>> scope
>>   to be valid and otherwise take users to a disambiguation page.
>>
>>   See the following scenarios:
>>   Input: {{{#1}}}
>>   Output: {{{Did you mean: #PRODA-1, #PRODK-1, #PRODX-1}}}
>>
>>   Input: {{{#PRODA-1}}}
>>   Ouptput: {{{Redirecting to PRODA-1}}}
>>
>>   This should always be the behaviour, also for others objects like Wiki
>>   pages, Milestones, etc. While I am browsing ticket {{{#PRODA-1}}} (so I
>> am
>>   in the {{{PRODA}}} scope) and insert a link to {{{#5}}}, it will lead to
>> a
>>   disambiguation page (though {{{#PRODA-5}}} may be pushed to the top
>>   because it is likely relevant).
>>
>
> It is most annoying that search no longer understands these links at all! In
> the long run I seem to remember hoping that we might end up going to the
> resource that is in scope but providing disambiguation links near the top of
> the page when the user has not specified scope properly and there are other
> possible interpretations. I think that this might balance keeping links
> working with being just annoying enough to encourage users to use proper
> scoping into the future. It could then also apply to any of the resource
> links in tickets and wiki pages and not just search.
>
> Cheers,
>     Gary

Reply via email to