Looks like there has been a misinterpretation of the idea from my side. I'll get back on the details again.
Regards, Shiva Teja. On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Shiva Teja <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gary, > Having one more page for reports might not make sense. So yes, I will be > extending the existing reports framework. > > Regards, > Shiva Teja. > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Gary Martin <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 01/05/13 15:00, Shiva Teja wrote: >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> Here's a list of reports that I'll be generating as a part of the >>> project(Combining mine with the one's suggested by Joe and Gary.) >>> >>> For visualising using graphs(very much similar to Ryan's >>> TracTicketStats[1]): >>> * Number of tickets opened/closed etc in a period(weeks, months etc.) >>> by >>> all users or by a particular user. >>> * Number of tickets opened/closed by a user in a period or all time(I >>> mean, the graph will contain number of tickets opened by each top >>> users.). >>> * Top commenters. >>> * Activity of a user in a period(Measured by comments?) >>> >>> For reports similar to current reports functionality: >>> * Tickets opened/closed/assigned to a particular user in a specified >>> period. >>> * Abandoned tickets - tickets that haven't been modified for a long >>> time. >>> * x highest priority tickets that are closed during the current week. >>> * x highest priority tickets that still remain open . >>> >>> Or similar variations of these can be added while doing the project. I am >>> not sure if "all" of these will be really useful for an issue tracker. So >>> if you feel anything is unnecessary, please reply. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/**TracTicketStatsPlugin<http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TracTicketStatsPlugin> >>> >>> PS: I will be using the same in my application. So if you feel any part >>> is >>> not clear, please specify. Thanks :) >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shiva Teja >>> >>> >> Hi, >> >> Are you saying that you propose to write a set of reports within the >> existing report framework? >> >> Cheers, >> Gary >> > >
