On 11/05/13 08:36, Andrej Golcov wrote:
On 10 May 2013 19:09, Joachim Dreimann <[email protected]> wrote:
I've been trying to look into the status of the relations work and what is
left to be done, but I can't find any tickets relating to it:
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/query?component=relations&or&keywords=~relations&col=id&col=summary&col=owner&col=type&col=status&col=priority&col=milestone&order=priority
I checked the BEP but again there's no indication on what progress has been
made, no indication on what is outstanding and no tickets are linked to
from there:
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/wiki/Proposals/BEP-0006
I didn't feel need for tickets fro BEP-0006 during bhrelations base
code setup, defining requirements, and discussion on the mailing list.
But now, when the next release is close, I agree with Joachim that
tracking of bhrelations progress is important.
I suggest "bhrealtions" keyword for tickets if you don't mind.
I have no particular problem with that if you find it makes life easier
for you but I tend to think that the relations component would be enough
to characterise the work. I hope you excuse me when I rarely set
keywords on any of the tickets that I raise!
I'm running into issues with it now but can't tell whether it's already
known, a stopgap - the issue has been around for at least a few days before
I raised it:
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/521
As I mentioned in ticket, the problem was in moving the widget in
bhrealtaions.* namespace that was not enabled by default. In fresh
installation, components from bhrealtaions.* are enabled by default
but the existing installations must be fixed manually by enabling
bhrealtaions.* in ini file. Nigthly build demo also has to have
bhrelations.* enabled.
We could look at enabling bhrelations as a part of the upgrade to 0.6.0
if we believe that it is ready at that point.
I suggest to make the widget including conditional, just in case if an
admin decides to disable bhrelations plugin. Any objections on this?
That makes good sense I think.
Cheers,
Gary
