On 7/12/13, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 12.07.2013 01:48, Ryan Ollos wrote: >> > Adding the issue to the release notes will require creating a new >> release, >> >> If that's the case, then we're doing something wrong. Release notes >> should not be part of the release tarball -- that should contain a >> /link/ to the release notes, so that any errata can be applied to the >> "live" release notes. >> >> Subversion keeps release notes in the project site repository. BH could >> have wiki pages with release notes -- only editable by committers, of >> course. >> >> -- Brane >> > > Keeping release notes on the wiki sounds good to me. >
fwiw + > On a related note, at some point we should do something about our diverging > installation instructions on the wiki (1) and in the repository (2). I vote > for using the wiki in this case as well. This was recently brought to our > attention again by a user (3). > > > (1) https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/wiki/BloodhoundInstall > (2) http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bloodhound/trunk/installer/README.rst > (3) http://markmail.org/message/pa6go7siozxtouje > There's a recent conversation in trac-users ML that seems to be related to this http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/trac/users/51772?page=last http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/trac/users/51804 -- Regards, Olemis. Apache™ Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
