I lean towards calling it "trunk", because that should be recognisable for those raising issues. 0.8dev almost suggests it is a release (candidate). I think we should also encourage users to provide the revision they were at, for example by calling the version:
"trunk (provide rev!)" On 14 January 2014 23:43, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> wrote: > The Version field currently lists the major releases of Bloodhound: 0.1.0 > 0.2.0 ... 0.7.0. From the activity on the mailing list, it seems that many > users are running the trunk. To improve defect reporting, I think we should > consider adding either "trunk" to the version field, or something like > 0.8dev. Any suggestions or preferences? > -- Joachim Dreimann | *User Experience Manager* WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data* e. [email protected] twitter @jdreimann <https://twitter.com/jdreimann>
