On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:19:47 -0800, Ryan Ollos
<[email protected]> wrote :

> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Apache Bloodhound <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > #694: Translations scaffolding
> > ------------------------+----------------------
> >   Reporter:  olemis     |      Owner:  olemis
> >       Type:  task       |     Status:  assigned
> >   Priority:  minor      |  Milestone:
> >  Component:  trac core  |    Version:  0.7.0
> > Resolution:             |   Keywords:  i18n
> > ------------------------+----------------------
> >
> > Comment (by SaintGermain):
> >
> >  Hello Olemis !
> >
> >  I agree that the patch can be included as it is, even if there is
> > room for improvement.
> >
> >  As for the bugs you mentionned, I suppose that without any
> > translation .po /.mo files, no one will see the bugs. ;-)
> >
> >  However I do not yet really understand how patch can or cannot be
> > included (who can decide ?). So I am asking...
> >
> >  Thanks !
> >
> 
> A committer must decide. You've been invited to be a committer, so
> one you complete the paperwork, then you will be able to push the
> patch.
> 
> Once you are a committer though, the general procedure for major
> changes, and particularly for someone who is a new committer, is to
> post the patch and wait a week or so for comments. If the feedback is
> positive and you feel good about the patch, then you go ahead and
> push it.

Hello Ryan,

Ok I have done the paperwork last thursday, so as soon as I got the
rights I will do as you said.

Thanks,

Reply via email to