---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Olemis Lang <[email protected]> Date: Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:03 PM Subject: Re: ThemeEnginePlugin support for pre-processor style sheets To: Leho Kraav <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Leho Kraav <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24.01.2014 19:50, Olemis Lang wrote: > >> >> - Initially I chose LESS due to the fact that BH relied upon Twitter >> Bootstrap >> - After looking for Python libs to get this done we (Leho and I) have >> decided to use Lesscpy >> * ... but there's definitely much better support for SASS in Python , >> afaics >> - I've been waiting for PR 28 [2]_ which seems to be close to actually >> happen >> - ... but then I realized that there is an official distribution of >> Twitter Bootstrap >> powered by SASS [3]_ >> >> > Hi ! :) > How's things going here, Olemis? Quiet ... > Looks like not much feedback here? I saw PR 28 landed for lesscpy, which > is great! > Yes , that's why I asked in advance ... > > Overall it feels like the individual preprocessor engines should be a > plugin that can be switched around with configuration. Yes , that's what I had in mind . > Stylus is also a valid preprocessor choice for example, and I see no > immediate reason to make people choose anything other than their favorite. > My request is about which one to develop **first** based on user feedback so that I can prioritize and schedule . On lack of feedback I fall back to LESS support powered by Lesscpy , as we had discussed earlier in the ticket . -- Regards, Olemis - @olemislc Apache(tm) Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound http://blood-hound.net Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
