I'd be fine with installing the instance to i.a.o/bh, and adding a rewrite
rule for i.a.o/bloodhound -> i.a.o/bh/product/BH; I expect that should keep
existing links intact?

-- Brane
On 11 Apr 2014 06:40, "Olemis Lang" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Gary Martin <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > On 10/04/14 13:25, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>
> Hi !
> :)
>
>
> > has anyone considered migrating the main BH instance at
> >> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound to a multi-product setup, and
> >> moving all the BH issues to a product? Doing so would let us create new
> >> products there and migrate other projects over to using Bloodhound,
> >> without having to create a new BH instance for each.
> >>
> >> Obviously, I have Subversion in mind here; he move to multi-product
> >> would be only a first step, of course, since we'd have to write a tool
> >> to migrate the issues off Tigris; but that's a different story.
> >>
> >> -- Brane
> >>
> >> BTW, you do know that repository browsing doesn't work there because the
> >> SVN repository plugin uses an old version of the SVN libs that don't
> >> understand 1.8 format repositories.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Well, it is certainly a long time overdue, yes.
> >
> >
> Based on my (every day) experience with blood-hound.net there are a few
> rough edges that still have to be polished . I'm hoping to be able to work
> side-by-side with Ryan during PyCon sprints on some of these (actually
> recorded as tickets in i.a.o/bh ) .
>
> With a naive approach to migration, one side effect of this will be a
> > change in the base location for all pages associated with bloodhound,
> from
> > /bloodhound to /bloodhound/products/BH (or whatever we chose for the
> > bloodhound prefix).
>
>
> We can do many things including (but not limited to)
>
> 1. Run BH instance in i.a.o/bh
>     * ... which also means that the global environment has to be moved
> somewhere else .
> 2. Run BH instance as a regular product e.g. i.a.o/bh/products/BH and
> redirect to this URL namespace all requests
>     that should had been handled by i.a.o/bh
>     * ... which also means that the global environment has to be moved
> somewhere else .
> 3. in all cases above the global environment may be  served at a product
> sibling URL
>
> I'm assuming that custom web bootstrap handlers will be used (e.g. like
> those we are using on blood-hound.net) .
>
> There are likely to be ways around this of course but it would seem odd to
> > have such a special status if other projects wish to join us. We need to
> > decide how important this aspect of the problem is.
> >
>
> IMHO consistency of existing links all over the ML archive (and beyond) is
> a strong reason to keep i.a.o/bh as it is . That's exactly what makes BH
> especial : it has valuable history . Obviating that detail will lead to a
> (potentially) huge amount of dangling references .
>
> [...]
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Olemis - @olemislc
>

Reply via email to