On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 18.08.2014 15:57, Gary Martin wrote:
> > On 11/08/14 14:31, Gary Martin wrote:
> >> On 11/08/14 02:26, Gary Martin wrote:
> >>> On 10/08/14 17:03, Ryan J Ollos wrote:
> >>>> I was just browsing over the steps for the Blooodhound release
> >>>> process and
> >>>> noticed that the RAT report is not available at the URL we have
> >>>> recorded:
> >>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/bloodhound/rat-output.html
> >>>>
> >>>> It appears as though we've been dropped from the Buildbot,
> >>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/
> >>>>
> >>>> It looks like others are seeing the issue as well,
> >>>>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-builds/201408.mbox/browser
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Looks like it is due to a problem with the svn update step on the
> >>> job. I
> >>> don't think we have ever been listed on the list of projects in ci.
> >>>
> >>> I've just raised a ticket though I'll have a look later if nobody gets
> >>> round to fixing it before then. It may turn out I can do something
> >>> about it.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>      Gary
> >>
> >> OK, looks like this is being worked on. The buildbot job works now
> >> and so we have
> >> http://ci.apache.org/projects/bloodhound/rat-output.xml successfully
> >> created. However, the html page will still be missing and this seems
> >> to be a more general problem for infra to solve. I believe they are
> >> already aware of this problem.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>     Gary
> >
> > I seem somehow to have missed when the
> > http://ci.apache.org/projects/bloodhound/rat-output.html became
> > available again but it looks like all has been resolved.
> >
> > I also spotted that the only file it has a problem with was a
> > .gitignore file so I have just added our normal license header to
> > that. The rat report html will hopefully update shortly to indicate
> > this change.
>
> Uh ... where does the .gitignore file come from? It's certainly not used
> by Subversion. And we're not distributing it, nor is it likely to
> contain anything that may conceivably be covered by the Apache Licence,
> right?
>
> Just tell RAT to ignore the file instead. :)
>
> -- Brane


Thanks, addressed in r1619601.

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1619601

Reply via email to