On 04/12/14 22:13, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 04.12.2014 22:38, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>> (Resending since email from my Apache alias didn't post to list)
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Ryan J Ollos <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue Dec 02 2014 at 8:08:03 PM
>> Subject: Bloodhound on PyPI
>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> I'm planning to publish Bloodhound to PyPI (1) with this release. Please
>> let me know if you have any comments about this.
>>
>> For the devs, if you'd like to have Owner permissions for the package on
>> PyPI so that you can publish new versions and update the page, please let
>> me know. I'll plan to add Gary and anyone else that speaks up.
>
> Sounds good. Are you going to post a link to the package on
> archive.apache.org, or something else? In general, it's a good idea to
> somehow make users download the source from a mirror, not our
> dist/archive servers. There's a script somewhere to get the nearest
> Apache mirror, but I'm not sure how much control you have over that on PyPI.
>
> It'd be a good idea to ask infra@ (or #asfinfra) for guidance.
>
> -- Brane
I agree, I think this is a great idea. I doubt that we would turn out to
be the first ASF project to be on PyPI after all.
On the assumption that this will be a standard part of the release
process, it would be good to see more PMC members interested in having
owner permissions.
Cheers,
Gary
