On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17.02.2015 20:22, Gary Martin wrote: > > On 17/02/15 14:28, John Chambers wrote: > > > > Incidentally, I think I specified the wrong redirect in my last > > message as we use products rather than product so that redirect should > > be: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound => > > https://issues.apache.org/bhound/products/BLOODHOUND > > > We can make the right redirects work without Infra involvement and > without changing the root URL https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound so > something horrible like .../bhound. > Yeah, everything else sounds fine to me, but I also hope we can avoid "bhound" in the URL. > All it takes is to have a careful look at the current set of URLs used > for BH stuff and then writing a number of rewrite rules that will catch > only those URLs, but not any new .../bloodhound/product URLs. If that > means we invent a virtual location, e.g., .../bloodhound/main to refer > to the global environment, that's fine, IMO. Better than the current > proposal in any case. > > -- Brane >
