Gary, i completely agree with you wouldnt we end up recreating the wheel here then? https://github.com/Djacket/djacket ; gitLab; https://gitea.io/en-US/ just to name a few?
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Gary <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, at 08:33 PM, Allan Swanepoel wrote: >> As a massive outsider to this project, I joined the ML in the hope to >> learn more about the bloodhound project, only to be met with the >> possible archiving of it. >> >> Please don't get the wrong impression, I enjoy python and open source >> as much as i enjoy contributing to OSS. >> >> I would like to raise a few troublesome concerns I would have with >> this project (again, this is one person): >> 1) Trac - the foundation of BH is still on Py2 - with basically 2 yrs >> until py2 is declared EOL (2020) . >> 2) Trac Version - Trac is on version 1.2(stable), afaik, BH has only >> been tested on Trac 0.11 - 0.13 >> >> So, i guess my day 1 question would be how would you get Bloodhound to >> py3 in ~2yrs, especially if the platform its based on isnt there yet? > > I think you make some very good points here. I would prefer to see > Bloodhound running on Python 3 and I am far from convinced that being > based on Trac will help us. > > Although it might point to a much larger effort, I would be interested > in opinions on whether the community (i.e. any part of the community > that wants to move forward with Bloodhound) would consider moving away > from Trac as the base for the project. > > Cheers, > Gary -- We live in an age when pizza gets to your home before the police. - Jeff Marder ------------------------------------------ Allan Swanepoel [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] +27 71 850 5554 Linux User #452990 Linux Machine #360914 ----------------------------------------------- IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the yorkshire terrier next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice from Microsoft: However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets.
