[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15125973#comment-15125973
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-888:
-------------------------------------------

GitHub user merlimat opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/8

    BOOKKEEPER-888: Dispatch individual callbacks from journal in different 
threads

    Currently the journal is sending all the responses from a single thread, 
after the entries in a batch are synced. Since a thread pool has been 
configured, it is better to spread the send-response tasks to all the available 
threads.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/merlimat/bookkeeper bk-888

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/8.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #8
    
----
commit 9cc51043380eede1b5ec403f556489d3c59f8b26
Author: Matteo Merli <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-03-10T21:56:49Z

    BOOKKEEPER-888: Dispatch individual callbacks from journal in different 
threads

----


> Dispatch individual callbacks from journal in different threads
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-888
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-888
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Matteo Merli
>            Assignee: Matteo Merli
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.4.0
>
>
> Currently the journal is sending all the responses from a single thread, 
> after the entries in a batch are synced. Since a thread pool has been 
> configured, it is better to spread the send-response tasks to all the 
> available threads.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to