[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15184487#comment-15184487
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-896:
-------------------------------------------
Github user sijie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/20#issuecomment-193621509
it seems that this pull request was based the old one?
> VM-local transport
> ------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-896
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-896
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.4.0
> Reporter: Enrico Olivelli
> Priority: Minor
>
> Hi,
> I’m wondering if it is feasible to have a way to launch a Bookie and a
> Bookkeeper client in the same JVM without using network, valid use cases are:
> 1) Unit testing
> 2) Installations using a single Bookie
> 1) Unit testing
> For unit testing I’m using mock classes which reproduce the functions of
> Bookkeeper but it makes my code more complex.
> Running network-related libraries limits the possibility of running tests in
> parallel and slows down the overall throughput of the tests
> 2) Single Bookie deployment
> Sometimes I need to launch software which uses Bookkeeper in a single-machine
> deployment, in this case using an embedded Bookie will let to have only a
> single JVM process which runs the full stack of the service.
> For instance when I’m using Bookkeeper as a commit log I need to implement a
> commit log which uses Bookkeeper for replicated deployments, a simple “file”
> based commit log and a pure in-memory commit log for unit testing.
> I think it could be done using Netty LocalServerChannelFactory (and related
> client-side classes) and some tricks about the use of hostnames, registration
> on Zookeeper and so on
> Of course the same issue will be on Zookkeeper
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
