Merged the pull request and also closed all hedwig jiras as "Won't Fix".
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > Here are the vote results: > > 9 +1 (6 from committers) > 0 +0 > 0 -1 > > So we are going to remove hedwig source code for current release. > > - Sijie > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Charan Reddy G <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Arun M. Krishnakumar <[email protected] >> > >> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:23 AM Robin Dhamankar <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > +1 >> > > > On Mar 8, 2016 10:22 AM, "Uma gangumalla" <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > Regards, >> > > > > Uma >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Since Hedwig has been inactive for a while, there was a >> proposal to >> > > > > remove >> > > > > > it from the code base. I'd raise a vote on removing hedwig from >> the >> > > > code >> > > > > > base. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Here is a ticket for the discussion : >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-769 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - Sijie >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
