addEntry() is susceptible to spurious wakeups?

[Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri]

LedgerHandle sync interface heavily depends on SyncCounter to convert async
interfaces
into sync interfaces.

Usaylly

SyncCounter.inc()
asyncCall()
SyncCOunter.block(0)

The block code is.

   synchronized void block(int limit) throws InterruptedException {
        while (i > limit) {
            int prev = i;
            wait();
            if (i == prev) {
                break;
            }
        }
    }

Since 'i' is going to be same as 'prev' on spurious wakeup, and wait() can
return
on spurious wakeups, aren't we susceptible? or I am missing something here?

How about replacing SyncCounter with CountDownLatch.
If we agree, I can raise a ticket.

-- 
Jvrao
---
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win. - Mahatma Gandhi