Arun, what did you observe?

I think we already handle session expires and zookeeper connection
recreation on ZooKeeperClient wrapper:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/blob/master/bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/zookeeper/ZooKeeperClient.java


We need to uncomment the code in Line 168.

https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/blob/master/bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/meta/AbstractZkLedgerManager.java#L168

(The change in twitter's branch does that retries:
https://github.com/twitter/bookkeeper/blob/master/bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/meta/AbstractZkLedgerManager.java#L211
)

- Sijie



On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Arun M. Krishnakumar <arunm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the pointer, Uma Gangumalla.
>
> Could you please give an overview of the fix in HDFS-3562.
>
> In the case of Bookkeeper-client, the ReadOnlyLedgerHandle constructs a
> watcher on the relevant Zookeeper nodes. The interesting things are the
> watches created by the ReadOnlyLedgerHandle on the relevant zookeeper
> nodes. We would lose the notifications that happen during the timeout. What
> would be the best way to proceed in such scenarios ? Should we reconstruct
> the state ? Is there any other such state that needs to be considered ?
>
> Thanks,
> Arun
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Uma gangumalla <umamah...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Good point, Venkateswara Rao.
> >
> > Some time ago, we worked on this scenarios. Here is a patch
> > available. HDFS-3562
> > Here we just tried to keep at application side. But as a long term
> solution
> > this could be placed at BK side as utility module? So that all
> applications
> > can benefit.
> >
> >
> > Note: As I remember RetryableZookeeper idea was taken from HBase.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Uma
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > jujj...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If a bookie looses connection with ZK, connection gets reestablished
> and
> > > life goes on. How are we handling it on the client case? Should we
> retry
> > at
> > > library level?
> > > or leave it up to the application? Any discussion/thoughts on this?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jvrao
> > > ---
> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then
> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to