[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15685008#comment-15685008
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-965:
-------------------------------------------
Github user jvrao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/73
@sijie Saving = perf benefit.
This whole thing is to cache the LAC in FileInfo rather than reaching out
on the disk and read it.
IMO the last entry must be in buffer cache and no need to hit the disk. So
I was little surprised to see you went this far to cache the LAC in FileInfo,
hence wondering if you have any measurements
on how much perf benefit you got with this change.
> Long Poll: Changes to the Write Path
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-965
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-965
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
> Reporter: Robin Dhamankar
> Assignee: Robin Dhamankar
> Fix For: 4.5.0
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
