Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com > wrote:
> If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond? > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It depends on the "host". >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use the >> room >> linked at >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Community+Meetings >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter) >> >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend. >> >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the meeting >> ? >> >> >> >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>: >> >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join the >> right >> > one this time. >> > >> > >> > - Bobby >> > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < >> > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Great! >> > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes >> > >> > >> > Enrico >> > >> > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com>: >> > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's patch. >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore has >> takes >> > > to Netty 4.1.7. >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans >> <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a >> different >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want to >> > make >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > - Bobby >> > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give it a >> try. >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. >> Our >> > > code >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see >> > what >> > > > differences there are with the API. >> > > > >> > > > - Bobby >> > > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < >> > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my >> > projects >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch >> > > > to Netty 4 >> > > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ? >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take >> care >> > of >> > > > the first port ? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Enrico >> > > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid >> >: >> > > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then later. >> > Simply >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in >> production >> > so >> > > > we >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot of >> other >> > > > patches >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of patches >> to >> > > push >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more difficult if >> not >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until 4.6.x >> for >> > > > netty4 >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply so we >> can >> > > start >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a change >> this >> > > big >> > > > is >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other >> opinions. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > - Bobby >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < >> > > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers, >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there >> is >> > > some >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using >> > native >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4. >> > > > > >> > > > > How the work is going ? >> > > > > >> > > > > Open questions are: >> > > > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL >> > > > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work >> from >> > it >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ? >> > > > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4: >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo and now >> from >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x. >> > > > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ? >> > > > > >> > > > > -- Enrico >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Jvrao >> > > --- >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, >> then >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > Jvrao > --- > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > > > -- Jvrao --- First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi
