Closed this voting thread. The vote for "trying out Github" is accepted with 5 +1 (3 binding votes) and 0 -1.
We can start trying out Github issues and build the workflow that is suitable for us. If anyone has the idea on the workflow, feel free to raise the discussion and propose the changes. The result is: 5 +1, 0 -1 Matteo Merli (binding) Ivan Kelly (binding) Sijie Guo (binding) Enrico Ollivelli Jia Zhai - Sijie On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Per the community meeting > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-06-01+Meeting+notes> > this morning, JV proposed to start use Github issues for issue tracking for > a few months and see how does it work out. I am starting this email thread > to vote for this. > > The vote will be: > > - Start using Github issues/pull requests for issue tracking for 3 months. > - During this 3 months, we will continue using both JIRA and Github issues. > - After 3 months, if the community decides whether we should continue > using Github issues or moving from JIRA to Github issues. (The final > decision will be a separate vote in 3 months) > > Please vote +1 if in favor of trying out Github issues and -1 if not. > > See below thread and community meeting notes > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-06-01+Meeting+notes> > for reference: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201705.mbox/% > 3CCAO2yDyYKmUiSfGfkGCKtfP8mmQtcJubGoMO-KsWsjM9_3pOd0Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > - Sijie >
