Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/184
I am not expert of GitHub API and I am a python newbie, @Sijie I think
you created the actual script and maybe you be be able to edit is in
order to enhance it
I think that first of all we should discuss about the structure of
such an issue:
- labels ?
- milestones ?
my first proposals:
- labels -> we can use it for:
-- "component" in JIRA, like component/server, component/autorecovery
-- "priority", like priority/blocker
-- estimation of the difficulty, like 'newbie", "expert"
- milestone -> this is kind of "release", so we should create a 4.5.0
"milestone" ?
other "issue":
pull requests wil be bound to issues, we have to cases:
- the pull request is per-se and issue, so for small changes which
already have a PR we can create only the PR, and all will be "lighter"
- the issue will need more patches, we should define a conventional
way of referring to issues (GitHub recognizes the #NN syntax, and is
able to automatically close related issues)
I don't know the "magic works" that the asfgit + bk-merge is doing
undercover, it is a missing piece from my part: the merge script is
adding a comment with "closes #NNN" but this comment is not reported
in "git log"
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
