On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is not a blocker for me. > > But if we want consistency, either applying pattern "asyncXYZ()" or > "xyzAsync()" for async operations works for me. xyzAsync is better than asyncXyz, as it will put the async and sync versions together in the javadoc.
So, there's 3 options here. 1. Remove Closeable 2. Some kind of split of sealing and close 3. Create sync and async versions of all with Async suffix. I think 3 is the most palatable. If there's no objections I'll push a patch later today. -Ivan
