Yes we need votes for both proposals.

We can wait to see if the new release window work before declaring an
official policy.

It might be worthing waiting for a few more days before starting a vote. So
other people can chime in if they have different ideas.

Thanks,
Sijie

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 12:05 AM Alessandro Luccaroni - Diennea <
alessandro.luccar...@diennea.com> wrote:

> Do we need a vote for both proposal?
>
> Regarding the EOL Policy: do we want to wait and see if the new release
> window works before declaring an official policy?
>
> Regards,
> Alessandro
>
> > -----Messaggio originale-----
> > Da: Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>
> > Inviato: martedì 3 dicembre 2019 08:19
> > A: Bookkeeper-Dev <dev@bookkeeper.apache.org>
> > Oggetto: Re: Website update after 4.10, Time Based Release plan and EOL
> >
> > Yes. We can probably relax the release window to be every 6 months. If
> the
> > growth of development increases again, we can revert it back to every 3
> > months.
> >
> > Regarding EOL policy, we haven't really discussed how to proceed it.
> Most of
> > the systems I know are already using newer versions than 4.7.0. I think
> we
> > can consider deprecating the versions older than 4.7.0.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sijie
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 5:49 AM Alessandro Luccaroni - Diennea <
> > alessandro.luccar...@diennea.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi BookKeepers,
> > > after the 4.10 release I see that the
> > > https://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/releases/ page needs some
> > care.
> > > We are still listing 4.10 as the next feature release and we have
> > > skipped
> > > 3 release windows.
> > >
> > > I can see on Github that since the early 2019 the rate of contribution
> > > have slowed down a bit, so I think we should relax the Time Based
> > > Release Plan (new release every 6 month?).
> > >
> > > Apart from that, do we have an official EOL Policy for BookKeeper? On
> > > the website I see that we list all the version of BK back to v4.0.0
> > > (2011) Many of these older version had very little usage, but since we
> > > are starting to see many project using BK downstream maybe we should
> > > clarify the full lifecycle of BK
> > >
> > > Alessandro Luccaroni
> > > Platform Manager @ Diennea - MagNews
> > > Tel.: (+39) 0546 066100 Int. 924 - Mob.: (+39) 393 7273519 Viale
> > > G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) - Italy
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVACY NOTICE
> > > This e-mail (including any attachments) is strictly confidential and
> > > may also contain privileged information. If you are not the intended
> > > recipient you are not authorised to read, print, save, process or
> > > disclose this message. If you have received this message by mistake,
> > > please inform the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail, its
> > attachments and any copies.
> > > Any use, distribution, reproduction or disclosure by any person other
> > > than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and the person
> > > responsible may incur in penalties.
> > > The use of this e-mail is only for professional purposes; there is no
> > > guarantee that the correspondence towards this e-mail will be read
> > > only by the recipient, because, under certain circumstances, there may
> > > be a need to access this email by third subjects belonging to the
> Company.
> > >
>
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVACY NOTICE
> This e-mail (including any attachments) is strictly confidential and may
> also contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient
> you are not authorised to read, print, save, process or disclose this
> message. If you have received this message by mistake, please inform the
> sender immediately and destroy this e-mail, its attachments and any copies.
> Any use, distribution, reproduction or disclosure by any person other than
> the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and the person responsible
> may incur in penalties.
> The use of this e-mail is only for professional purposes; there is no
> guarantee that the correspondence towards this e-mail will be read only by
> the recipient, because, under certain circumstances, there may be a need to
> access this email by third subjects belonging to the Company.
>

Reply via email to