Sorry about that. I misunderstood.
On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 20:37, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea <enrico.olive...@diennea.com.invalid> wrote: > Thank you Yong > But I am not sure what's your LGTM for > > My question is: > I wonder if for this kind of small patches that do not have an impact > over code it is possible to simply commit them just given another +1 from > a non-committer, but "known contributor". > > > Enrico > > > Il giorno 08/05/20, 14:35 "Yong Zhang" <zhangyong1025...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > LGTM. > > Yong > > On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 20:26, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno mar 5 mag 2020 alle ore 14:49 Enrico Olivelli < > > eolive...@gmail.com> > > ha scritto: > > > > > Hello Bookkeepers, > > > I would like to commit this little patch that improves GitHub > Actions. > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2323 > > > > > > I am looking for a +1. > > > > > > Matteo Minardi already approved it. > > > I wonder if for this kind of small patches that do not have an > impact > > over > > > code it is possible to simply commit them just given another +1 > from a > > > non-committer, but "known contributor". > > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVACY NOTICE > This e-mail (including any attachments) is strictly confidential and may > also contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient > you are not authorised to read, print, save, process or disclose this > message. If you have received this message by mistake, please inform the > sender immediately and destroy this e-mail, its attachments and any copies. > Any use, distribution, reproduction or disclosure by any person other than > the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and the person responsible > may incur in penalties. > The use of this e-mail is only for professional purposes; there is no > guarantee that the correspondence towards this e-mail will be read only by > the recipient, because, under certain circumstances, there may be a need to > access this email by third subjects belonging to the Company. >