Sorry about that. I misunderstood.


On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 20:37, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea
<enrico.olive...@diennea.com.invalid> wrote:

> Thank you Yong
> But I am not sure what's your LGTM for
>
> My question is:
>  I wonder if for this kind of small patches that do not have an impact
> over  code it is possible to simply commit them just given another +1 from
> a  non-committer, but "known contributor".
>
>
> Enrico
>
>
> Il giorno 08/05/20, 14:35 "Yong Zhang" <zhangyong1025...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>     LGTM.
>
>     Yong
>
>     On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 20:26, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>     > Thoughts ?
>     >
>     > Enrico
>     >
>     > Il giorno mar 5 mag 2020 alle ore 14:49 Enrico Olivelli <
>     > eolive...@gmail.com>
>     > ha scritto:
>     >
>     > > Hello Bookkeepers,
>     > > I would like to commit this little patch that improves GitHub
> Actions.
>     > >
>     > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2323
>     > >
>     > > I am looking for a +1.
>     > >
>     > > Matteo Minardi already approved it.
>     > > I wonder if for this kind of small patches that do not have an
> impact
>     > over
>     > > code it is possible to simply commit them just given another +1
> from a
>     > > non-committer, but "known contributor".
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > Thoughts ?
>     > > Enrico
>     > >
>     >
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVACY NOTICE
> This e-mail (including any attachments) is strictly confidential and may
> also contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient
> you are not authorised to read, print, save, process or disclose this
> message. If you have received this message by mistake, please inform the
> sender immediately and destroy this e-mail, its attachments and any copies.
> Any use, distribution, reproduction or disclosure by any person other than
> the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and the person responsible
> may incur in penalties.
> The use of this e-mail is only for professional purposes; there is no
> guarantee that the correspondence towards this e-mail will be read only by
> the recipient, because, under certain circumstances, there may be a need to
> access this email by third subjects belonging to the Company.
>

Reply via email to