I made PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4446 to upgrade minimum required version to Java 17.
-Lari On 2024/05/27 01:17:14 ZhangJian He wrote: > Hi, BookKeepers, I want to propose and clarify a new CI strategy based on > our former practices. > > ## Current CI Jobs > > - **PR Validation Tests**: Currently, these jobs run on JDK 11 for every > pull request to ensure all changes meet our quality standards before > merging. > - **Platform Build Tests**: We run Windows and macOS builds on JDK 11. > - **Tests**: Major tests are currently only run on JDK 11 due to time > constraints(I think, please point out if I were wrong). > - **Compatibility Checks**: We perform basic compatibility checks across a > JDK matrix of 8, 11, 17, and 21, with JDK 21 added recently as per [this > pull request](https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4350). > - **OWASP Check**: Run as part of our daily builds or pom file changes to > ensure security vulnerabilities are identified and addressed swiftly. > - **Daily Builds**: These are three types of job in daily builds: higher > jdk linux, owasp, windows jdk(current running in jdk21, limited to some > development jobs, there are still many tests failures to be solved), due to > its speed and the ability to expose issues. > - **GitHub CodeQL, TYPOS**: These jobs are not related to JVM. > > ## Proposed JVM Strategy > > Given that JDK 11 will reach its end of life in October 2024 [1], I suggest > transitioning our main CI operations to **JDK 17**. This would include the > `PR Validation Tests`, `Platform Build Tests`, and `Tests`. > > For `Compatibility Checks`, we should consider maintaining checks only for > OpenJDK LTS versions that are not EOL. For instance, we can remove JDK 11 > from the compatibility matrix after October 2024. > > For `Daily Builds` on Linux, I propose adding OpenJDK LTS versions beyond > our main CI version. > > For `Daily Builds` on Windows and the `OWASP Check`, using the latest > OpenJDK version will leverage the most advanced and supported JDK features > and help expose more problems. > > Thank you for considering this strategic update. I look forward to your > feedback and further discussion. > > [1] [JDK 11 End of Life Update](https://access.redhat.com/articles/1299013) > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > Twitter: shoothzj > Wechat: shoothzj >
