+1(binding) Thanks ZhangJian He Twitter: shoothzj Wechat: shoothzj
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 8:08 AM lushiji(apache) <lush...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > At least combined with the current features of bookkeeper, > readOnlyModeOnAnyDiskFullEnabled should be enabled by default. > If a single disk is full and it is not switched to read-only, the > writeCache will only make the situation worse as the amount increases. > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 11:56 PM xiangying meng <xiangy...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Dear Bookkeeper Community, > > > > I hope this message finds you well. I would like to bring to your > > attention a proposal to change the default value of the > > `readOnlyModeOnAnyDiskFullEnabled` feature to true in Apache > > Bookkeeper. > > > > In our practical experience, converting a bookie to Read Only mode > > when any ledger disk is full is crucial. Without this change, a full > > bookie disk results in numerous message failures while attempting to > > write to the ledger disk. Additionally, since the bookie's status > > remains available, no alarms are triggered for maintenance personnel, > > leading to delays in response. > > > > This feature was introduced in [PR > > #3212](https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3212) and has proved > > to be stable over time. We believe it is safe and beneficial to enable > > this feature by default. > > > > Please feel free to share your thoughts or concerns regarding this change. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Xiangying Meng > >
