Does locations/winrm sound reasonable? (rather than reverting back to /core)
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Let's move winrm to brooklyn-server. > > > > On 09/12/2015 16:56, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > >> That should be (or at least become) a soft dependency, not a hard one. >> That aside, the winrm piece probably belongs in server. >> >> Hadrian >> >> On 12/09/2015 11:27 AM, John McCabe wrote: >> >>> Alex, all, (fyi Hadrian/Ciprian), >>> >>> >>> * fix pom files on result of `rearrange-incubator.sh` script so it builds >>>> >>>>> (make this a diff / git cherry-pick we can just apply once all PRs are >>>>>> merged?) >>>>>> >>>>>> John also said to me that he would take a look at this problem. He was >>>>> temporarily prevented from doing so by a bug in the split script which >>>>> broke TEMP-brooklyn-server, but that dodgy repo should now be fixed. >>>>> >>>>> John - any update? >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Just after having a chat with Richard about this, and am in the >>> process of >>> working through it. >>> >>> Have hit one problem so far, a circular dependency between >>> brooklyn-server >>> and brooklyn-library from some of the OSGI-ification changes. >>> >>> The 'Brooklyn Jclouds Location Targets' module in brooklyn-server has a >>> dependency on the 'brooklyn-software-winrm' artifact from >>> brooklyn-library, >>> but brooklyn-library itself depends on brooklyn-server. >>> >>> Any suggestions on what we should do with it? There's mention of >>> additional >>> cleanup required later in the commit (see pull#957 [1] (JIRA BROOKLYN-182 >>> [2])) >>> >>> /John >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-brooklyn/pull/957 >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-182 >>> >>> >
