+1 On 18 February 2016 at 17:08, John McCabe <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 at 15:52 Duncan Godwin < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 18 February 2016 at 15:51, David Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > /Dave. > > > > > > On 18/02/2016 15:25, Richard Downer wrote: > > > > > >> All, > > >> > > >> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn > > >> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the > > >> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web > > >> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production > > >> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts, > > >> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling > > >> addition to the Brooklyn project. > > >> > > >> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year, > > >> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has > > >> > > >>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of > > >>> > > >> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance > > >> process before merging the PR. > > >> > > >> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in > > >> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and > > >> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP > > >> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI. > > >> > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday > > >> 21st February 2016) > > >> > > >> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project > > >> [ ] 0, no opinion > > >> [ ] -1, reject contribution because... > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Richard. > > >> > > > > > > > > >
