Hi all,
I did the first two steps for applying for Fedora's Package Review
Process <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process>
Look [2] and [3]. I tested it and works well.
Please review and share your thoughts about [1] and [2] because I think
it needs discussion.
Main points:
- changing directory structure to standard /usr folder instead of using /opt
- PR-ing some changes against against brooklyn-dist repo
- place for publishing the .spec and src.rpm to apply for Apache
Brooklyn to become Mainstream Fedora Package
Valentin.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/blob/master/rpm-packaging/pom.xml
[2] https://github.com/bostko/brooklyn_fedorapkg/blob/master/brooklyn.spec
[3]
https://github.com/bostko/brooklyn_fedorapkg/releases/download/0.1/brooklyn-0.9.0-0.src.rpm
On 12/04/16 00:46, Valentin Aitken wrote:
Hi,
What do you think about adding Apache Brooklyn to Fedora and from
there to Redhat and CentOS?
As an opensource project I think it will be good to bring it to more
wider audience to the Fedora Community.
However before applying, when reading Fedora's Package Review Process
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process> [1],
I recognize several build problems:
- cannot find a location where the rpm spec file is publicly
available. Only rpm available in [2]
- there is no srpm publicly available
- I think the spec file should be tested outside the rpm-maven-plugin.
I tested cd brooklyn-dist/packaging/target/rpm/apache-brooklyn/SPECS;
rpmbuild -ba apache-brooklyn.spec
and it didn't work
For this to happen we have to also maintain a Fedora repo like this [3]
but I guess I am not the only one keen on getting this to Fedora
community.
Valentin.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
[2]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/brooklyn/apache-brooklyn-0.9.0-rc2/
[3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/httpd.git/tree/
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package
