Github user nakomis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/151#discussion_r64197677
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/location/byon/FixedListMachineProvisioningLocation.java
---
@@ -345,7 +346,7 @@ protected void updateMachineConfig(T machine, Map<?, ?>
flags) {
// For backwards compatibility, where peristed state did not
have this.
origConfigs = Maps.newLinkedHashMap();
}
- Map<String, Object> strFlags =
ConfigBag.newInstance(flags).getAllConfig();
+ Map<String, Object> strFlags =
ConfigBag.newInstanceExtending(((AbstractConfigurationSupportInternal)machine.config()).getBag(),
flags).getAllConfig();
--- End diff --
Does this need to be applied to the other implementations of
`MachineProvisioningLocation.obtain()`?
Will this effect the behaviour of existing blueprints?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
