Github user aledsage commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/356#discussion_r81123434
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/core/entity/lifecycle/ServiceStateLogic.java
 ---
    @@ -153,6 +153,26 @@ private ServiceStateLogic() {}
         }
         
         public static void setExpectedState(Entity entity, Lifecycle state) {
    +        waitForServiceUpIfStateIsRunning(entity, state);
    +        
((EntityInternal)entity).sensors().set(Attributes.SERVICE_STATE_EXPECTED, new 
Lifecycle.Transition(state, new Date()));
    +        
    +        Maybe<Enricher> enricher = 
EntityAdjuncts.tryFindWithUniqueTag(entity.enrichers(), 
ComputeServiceState.DEFAULT_ENRICHER_UNIQUE_TAG);
    +        if (enricher.isPresent() && enricher.get() instanceof 
ComputeServiceState) {
    +            ((ComputeServiceState)enricher.get()).onEvent(null);
    +        }
    +    }
    +    public static Lifecycle getExpectedState(Entity entity) {
    +        Transition expected = 
entity.getAttribute(Attributes.SERVICE_STATE_EXPECTED);
    +        if (expected==null) return null;
    +        return expected.getState();
    +    }
    +
    +    public static void setActualState(Entity entity, Lifecycle state) {
    --- End diff --
    
    Let's delete `setActualState`: it's not used. The pattern used is to set 
the expected state, and then for the actual state to be inferred by an enricher.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to