Github user mikezaccardo commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/403#discussion_r86839055
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/entity/group/DynamicFabricImpl.java ---
    @@ -122,27 +124,50 @@ public void start(Collection<? extends Location> 
locsO) {
             try {
                 Map<Entity, Task<?>> tasks = Maps.newLinkedHashMap();
                 
    -            // first look at existing Startable children - start them with 
the locations passed in here,
    -            // if they have no locations yet
    -            for (Entity child: getChildren()) {
    -                if (child instanceof Startable) {
    -                    addMember(child);
    -                    Location it = null;
    -                    if (child.getLocations().isEmpty())
    -                        // give him any of these locations if he has none, 
allowing round robin here
    -                        if (!locationsToStart.isEmpty()) {
    -                            it = locationsToStart.get(locIndex++ % 
locationsToStart.size());
    -                            
((EntityInternal)child).addLocations(Arrays.asList(it));
    +            if (includeInitialChildren) {
    +                // first look at existing Startable children - start them 
with the locations passed in here,
    +                // if they have no locations yet
    +                for (Entity child: getChildren()) {
    +                    if (child instanceof Startable) {
    +                        addMember(child);
    --- End diff --
    
    It would appear intentional, as it is the other fundamental difference 
between the cases (the first being location consumption).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to