There have been a lot of improvements to jclouds since their 1.9.2
release. Unless there are big issues with using 2.0.0 that would get my
vote.
Best
Alex
On 16/11/2016 07:26, Andrea Turli wrote:
+1
Svet,
FYI I'm working on #409 and #415 now that jclouds 2.0 is official released.
Andrea
On 16 November 2016 at 12:33, Svetoslav Neykov <
svetoslav.ney...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
Is including jclouds 2.0 too big of a change to consider, what do people
think?
If that's considered too risky then I suggest following with a 0.11.0 not
too long after, including jclouds 2.0.
There's already work to get it running with Brooklyn at
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/415 <
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/415> and
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/409 <
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/409>.
Svet.
On 16.11.2016 г., at 13:22, Aled Sage <aled.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
It's far past time that we did a Brooklyn 0.10.0 release! I suggest we
aim for that soon.
To that end, I suggest the following steps:
* Deal with open PRs:
o People shout out about any PRs you think are very important to
be merged, before that release.
o Review open PRs
(for any that won't get merged into 0.10.0, clearly mark them as
such and say why).
* Any pending/remaining work:
o Give people until Friday evening (uk time) to submit any other
very important PRs that are being working on.
o People shout out about any known issues that they see as
blockers for a release.
* Do some initial testing, using master (before Friday).
* Aim to produce a first release candidate on Friday evening (uk time).
* Do the usual QA/fix cycle until the release is ready.
* Write release notes, etc.
Of the first steps, reviewing the PRs is a big piece of work! If you
have time to help, then please lend a hand by reviewing and/or testing the
PRs, and commenting on them.
I don't think we should try to squeeze lots of additional PRs into
0.10.0 - there is already a huge amount in there compared to 0.9.0!
Richard, are our release process docs up-to-date at [1]?
Aled
[1] http://brooklyn.apache.org/developers/committers/release-
process/index.html
