Hi Valentin, That's great, but I see that you've given them a reference to 0.10.0-rc2. We must not share release candidates outside this list. Please can you "pause" this - if not possible then please remove it.
I'm appreciate what you're doing so I'm sorry to have to block this. Apart from the fact that RCs are untested and possibly unsafe, the major issue is that they are marked with the version 0.10.0. If they start getting out "in the wild" then it's impossible to know if someone has installed 0.10.0 rc2 or 0.10.0 final, or any other release candidates, because they all have the same visible version number. Thanks Richard. On 12 December 2016 at 23:21, Valentin Aitken < [email protected]> wrote: > Here it is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404044 > > Cheers, > Valentin. > > On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 01:23 +0300, Valentin Aitken wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I did the first two steps for applying for Fedora's Package Review > > Process > > Look [2] and [3]. I tested it and works well. > > > > Please review and share your thoughts about [1] and [2] because I > > think it needs discussion. > > > > Main points: > > - changing directory structure to standard /usr folder instead of > > using /opt > > - PR-ing some changes against against brooklyn-dist repo > > - place for publishing the .spec and src.rpm to apply for Apache > > Brooklyn to become Mainstream Fedora Package > > > > Valentin. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/blob/master/rpm-packaging > > /pom.xml > > [2] https://github.com/bostko/brooklyn_fedorapkg/blob/master/brooklyn > > .spec > > [3] https://github.com/bostko/brooklyn_fedorapkg/releases/download/0. > > 1/brooklyn-0.9.0-0.src.rpm > > > > On 12/04/16 00:46, Valentin Aitken wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > What do you think about adding Apache Brooklyn to Fedora and from > > > there to Redhat and CentOS? > > > > > > As an opensource project I think it will be good to bring it to > > > more wider audience to the Fedora Community. > > > > > > However before applying, when reading Fedora's Package Review > > > Process [1], > > > I recognize several build problems: > > > - cannot find a location where the rpm spec file is publicly > > > available. Only rpm available in [2] > > > - there is no srpm publicly available > > > - I think the spec file should be tested outside the rpm-maven- > > > plugin. > > > I tested cd brooklyn-dist/packaging/target/rpm/apache- > > > brooklyn/SPECS; rpmbuild -ba apache-brooklyn.spec > > > and it didn't work > > > > > > For this to happen we have to also maintain a Fedora repo like this > > > [3] > > > but I guess I am not the only one keen on getting this to Fedora > > > community. > > > > > > Valentin. > > > > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/brooklyn/apache-brooklyn > > > -0.9.0-rc2/ > > > [3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/httpd.git/tree/ > > > [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package > > >
