Github user ahgittin commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/462#discussion_r100846344
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/core/objs/BasicSpecParameter.java ---
    @@ -404,7 +431,126 @@ public static void 
addParameters(AbstractBrooklynObjectSpec<?, ?> spec, List<? e
                 
spec.parametersAdd(BasicSpecParameter.fromSpec(loader.getManagementContext(), 
spec));
             }
             if (explicitParams.size() > 0) {
    -            spec.parametersAdd(explicitParams);
    +            spec.parametersReplace(resolveParameters(explicitParams, 
spec.getParameters(), spec));
    +        }
    +    }
    +
    +    /** merge parameters against other parameters and known and 
type-inherited config keys */
    +    static Collection<SpecParameter<?>> resolveParameters(Collection<? 
extends SpecParameter<?>> newParams, Collection<? extends SpecParameter<?>> 
existingReferenceParamsToKeep, AbstractBrooklynObjectSpec<?,?> spec) {
    +        Map<String,SpecParameter<?>> existingToKeep = MutableMap.of();
    +        if (existingReferenceParamsToKeep!=null) {
    +            for (SpecParameter<?> p: existingReferenceParamsToKeep) { 
    +                existingToKeep.put(p.getConfigKey().getName(), p);
    +            }
    +        }
    +
    +        List<SpecParameter<?>> result = MutableList.<SpecParameter<?>>of();
    +        for (SpecParameter<?> p: newParams) {
    +            if (p instanceof SpecParameterForInheritance) {
    +                SpecParameter<?> existingP = 
existingToKeep.remove(p.getConfigKey().getName());
    +                if (existingP!=null) {
    +                    p = 
((SpecParameterForInheritance<?>)p).resolveWithAncestor(existingP);
    +                } else {
    +                    // TODO find config keys on the type (not available as 
parameters)
    +                    /* we don't currently do this due to low priority; all 
it means if there is a config key in java,
    +                     * and a user wishes to expose it as a parameter, they 
have to redeclare everything;
    +                     * nothing from the config key in java will be 
inherited */
    +                    p = 
((SpecParameterForInheritance<?>)p).resolveWithAncestor((ConfigKey<?>)null);
    +                }
    +                result.add(p);
    +            } else {
    +                existingToKeep.remove(p.getConfigKey().getName());
    +                result.add(p);
    +            }
    +        }
    +        result.addAll(existingToKeep.values());
    +        return result;
    +    }
    +
    +    /** instance of {@link SpecParameter} which includes information about 
what fields are explicitly set,
    +     * for use with a subsequent merge */
    +    @SuppressWarnings("serial")
    +    @Beta
    +    static class SpecParameterForInheritance<T> extends 
BasicSpecParameter<T> {
    --- End diff --
    
    the separate class is to know when something still needs to be inherited 
and when inheritance has been completed.  would welcome a second opinion here 
@neykov because it is ugly, but i think it should never leak ie the ugliness is 
entirely hidden.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to