Github user neykov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/565#discussion_r106215140
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/core/objs/AbstractConfigurationSupportInternal.java
---
@@ -138,18 +131,14 @@ public T call() {
// getRaw returns Maybe(val) if the key was explicitly set (where
val can be null)
// or Absent if the config key was unset.
Object unresolved = getRaw(key).or(key.getDefaultValue());
- final Object marker = new Object();
- // Give tasks a short grace period to resolve.
- Object resolved = Tasks.resolving(unresolved)
+ Maybe<Object> resolved = Tasks.resolving(unresolved)
.as(Object.class)
- .defaultValue(marker)
.immediately(true)
.deep(true)
.context(getContext())
- .get();
- return (resolved != marker)
- ? TypeCoercions.tryCoerce(resolved, key.getTypeToken())
- : Maybe.<T>absent();
+ .getMaybe();
+ if (resolved.isAbsent()) return
Maybe.Absent.<T>castAbsent(resolved);
+ return TypeCoercions.tryCoerce(resolved.get(), key.getTypeToken());
--- End diff --
Now that there's no marker object you can rely on `ValueResolver`'s
coercion directly (by passing in the expected type).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---