Github user ahgittin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/746#discussion_r127677290
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/core/mgmt/ha/OsgiArchiveInstaller.java
---
@@ -336,14 +358,14 @@ private synchronized void close() {
if (!updating) {
osgiManager.managedBundlesRecord.addManagedBundle(result);
result.code =
OsgiBundleInstallationResult.ResultCode.INSTALLED_NEW_BUNDLE;
- result.message = "Installed
"+result.getMetadata().getVersionedName()+" with ID
"+result.getMetadata().getId();
+ result.message = "Installed Brooklyn catalog bundle
"+result.getMetadata().getVersionedName()+" with ID
"+result.getMetadata().getId()+" ["+result.bundle.getBundleId()+"]";
--- End diff --
this will happen if you install a `catalog.bom` which doesn't come from
OSGi and which declare a bundle. we should be declaring a `bundle` in all
BOMs. i've added this (some cheekily pushed to other projects).
the odd thing though is that the "delete empty BOMs" logic should be
cleaning this up. i'm looking at that. (i think all other comments are
addressed.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
