Following on from that, I have made a PR to make the karaf release the primary one and release the old one as `classic`
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/103 Thanks for your input Thomas. I think that we should only release one set of RPM and deb packages and make those the karaf version in this release. This means that anyone who wants to use the classic version will need to use the classic tar.gz or zip. What does everyone think? Many thanks Duncan On 7 September 2017 at 17:19, Thomas Bouron <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Duncan. > > I agree, a new version of Brooklyn would be great. I particularly support > the change of making Karaf the default distribution. > I'm actually working on various improvements of the RPM and DEB packages, > and make them use Karaf as well. I should push a PR for this next week. > > Regarding the PR, brooklyn-server/799 has been merged already. > > Cheers > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 at 16:54 Duncan Godwin <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > It's probably about time for a Brooklyn 0.12.0 release. There have been > > significant developments since 0.11.0 which warrant a new release. Before > > we produce this however I propose we make the following changes: > > > > - Make Karaf the default distribution with the current `classic` launch > > method depreciated > > - Update the documentation accordingly > > - Merge brooklyn-server/805 and probably brooklyn-server/799 > > > > Are there any other changes which people think should be included? > > > > Let us know your opinions and if there are no outstanding problems I can > > progress with the release next week. > > > > Many thanks > > > > Duncan > > > -- > > Thomas Bouron • Senior Software Engineer @ Cloudsoft Corporation • > https://cloudsoft.io/ > Github: https://github.com/tbouron > Twitter: https://twitter.com/eltibouron >
