Hello Alex, Thomas, Is the new Sylvain's proposal acceptable for you? Thank you Christian
Le lun. 17 déc. 2018 à 16:56, Nicolas TITH <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > On 2018/12/13 09:36:13, Sylvain FEROT wrote: > > Hi,> > > We deleted the "+" button because we think it could confuse users: they> > > could think that the button does something different than just selecting > an> > > entity. It also overload a bit more the UI.> > > If we want to keep it, we chave 2 proposals :> > > Proposal 1 :> > > it does the same thing as selecting an entity> > > > > Proposal 2 :> > > - clicking on the "+" would re-open the left panel. The entity is > selected> > > (strong line around the circle). The right panel stay in the same > state.> > > - clicking on a circle/entity would re-open the right panel. The entity > is> > > selected (strong line around the circle). The left panel stay in the > same> > > state.> > > > > Please let us know what you prefer.> > > > > Best regards,> > > > > Sylvain> > > > > Le mar. 11 déc. 2018 à 16:32, Alex Heneveld > > > a écrit :> > > > > >> > > > Hi Sylvain-> > > >> > > > My 2p ... I like all of these ideas, been thinking the same myself, > with> > > > one exception.> > > >> > > > I like the green "+" button as it gives an alternative way to add> > > > something. But could be talked out of it if others think it's too> > > > confusing having these multiple ways.> > > >> > > > The rest of it, tidying up the palette schizophrenia, bring it on > ASAP!> > > >> > > > Maybe it makes sense to evaluate the green + once we have those > working?> > > >> > > > Best> > > > Alex> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > On 29/11/2018 16:24, Sylvain FEROT wrote:> > > > > Sorry for that, here is a zip file with the pictures :> > > > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yLIK71qefZWum-JI15AfUq1ZIQKjy22a> > > > >> > > > > Le jeu. 29 nov. 2018 à 17:03, Thomas Bouron > > > > a> > > > > écrit :> > > > >> > > > >> Hi Sylvain, and thanks for the proposal!> > > > >>> > > > >> The Apache ML don't like images embedded inside emails and strip > them> > > > out.> > > > >> Could you instead make them available somewhere, and post the links > to> > > > >> them?> > > > >>> > > > >> Thanks.> > > > >>> > > > >> Best.> > > > >>> > > > >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 15:41 Sylvain FEROT > > > > >> wrote:> > > > >>> > > > >>> Hello everyone,> > > > >>>> > > > >>> Currently we have a problem with palette. It can be shown on both > left> > > > >> and> > > > >>> right panel at the same time. It does the same thing but with > slight> > > > >>> differences :> > > > >>> [image: image.png]> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> Left palette open a popup before adding to the blueprint. Right> > > > >>> palette does not> > > > >>> [image: image.png]> > > > >>>> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> A toolbar is shown on the right, but always with one element. If> > > > you> > > > >>> close this element the whole panel is empty and useless.> > > > >>> [image: image.png]> > > > >>>> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> If you select one entity and click on the plus button of another,> > > > the> > > > >>> palettes add to different entities> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> When we compose a blueprint, we always have both panels open. On> > > > small> > > > >>> screens there’s not much place left to see the graph.> > > > >>>> > > > >>> To improve this we could do something like this :> > > > >>>> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> Put everything that add things in the left panel, and keep the> > > > >>> configuration in the right panel> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> Add a toolbar to the right panel, such as the left panel. The > tabs> > > > >>> would be the different spec editor sections : configuration,> > > > >> policies, …> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> Add a close button to the right panel, to be coherent with the > left> > > > >>> panel. Combined with the previous point, it allow to keep opened > or> > > > >> closed> > > > >>> the right panel> > > > >>> [image: with-arrows.png][image: image.png]> > > > >>>> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> If no entity is selected, remove the right toolbar. It appears> > > > again> > > > >>> when we select an entity.> > > > >>> [image: image.png]> > > > >>>> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> Delete the green plus button, it’s no more needing and create> > > > >>> confusion for users.> > > > >>> [image: image.png]> > > > >>>> > > > >>> -> > > > >>>> > > > >>> Everything else work like before, including drag & drop> > > > >>>> > > > >>> With the points before, we could remove the add buttons of the> > > > different> > > > >>> sections of the spec editor. If you prefer to keep the buttons, > we> > > > could> > > > >>> also make them just open and highlight sections on the left > panel.> > > > >>> [image: image.png]> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> Best regards,> > > > >>>> > > > >>> Sylvain> > > > >>>> > > > >> --> > > > >> Thomas Bouron> > > > >> Senior Software Engineer> > > > >>> > > > >> *Cloudsoft *| Bringing Business to the Cloud> > > > >>> > > > >> GitHub: https://github.com/tbouron> > > > >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/eltibouron> > > > >>> > > > >> Need a hand with AWS? Get a Free Consultation.> > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > -- > > -- > > Nicolas Tith > UI Developer > [email protected] > > > UShareSoft SAS. > 12 rue Ampère 38000, Grenoble, France > +33 (0)4 76 96 23 29 > https://www.usharesoft.com <https://www.usharesoft.com/home/> > > This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged > information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). > Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the > taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. > E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they > can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates > with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. UShareSoft is not > responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any > responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion > and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely > those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. >
