Hi all,
I see there was great progress with the karaf version bump last week and
over the weekend, e.g. [1, 2].
Looking at brooklyn master karaf dependency versions using `find
${BROOKLYN_HOME}/system/ -name "*.jar"` and running a little program to
find multiple versions, I see the following concerning duplicates:
system//org/apache/aries/spifly/org.apache.aries.spifly.dynamic.bundle:
[1.2.2, 1.2]
system//javax/mail/mail: [1.4.7, 1.4.4]
The full list is:
system//org/ow2/asm/asm: [5.2, 7.1]
system//org/ow2/asm/asm-util: [5.2, 7.1]
system//org/ow2/asm/asm-tree: [5.2, 7.1]
system//org/ow2/asm/asm-analysis: [5.2, 7.1]
system//org/ow2/asm/asm-commons: [5.2, 7.1]
system//org/yaml/snakeyaml: [1.23, 1.17]
system//org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jzlib:
[1.1.3_2, 1.0.7_1]
system//org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.okhttp:
[3.4.1_1, 2.2.0_1]
system//org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.okio:
[1.9.0_1, 1.2.0_1]
system//org/apache/aries/spifly/org.apache.aries.spifly.dynamic.bundle:
[1.2.2, 1.2]
system//javax/mail/mail: [1.4.7, 1.4.4]
system//javax/ws/rs/javax.ws.rs-api: [2.0.1, 2.1.1]
Compare this with Brooklyn version 1.0.0-M1:
system//org/ow2/asm/asm-all: [5.2, 5.0.2]
system//org/yaml/snakeyaml: [1.17, 1.22]
system//org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.activation-api-1.1:
[2.5.0, 2.6.0]
system//org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jzlib:
[1.1.3_2, 1.0.7_1]
system//org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.okhttp:
[3.4.1_1, 2.2.0_1]
system//org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.okio:
[1.9.0_1, 1.2.0_1]
system//org/apache/aries/org.apache.aries.util: [1.1.3, 1.1.0]
system//com/google/code/gson/gson: [2.5, 2.3]
I'll take a look at these and see if they really are a problem or not.
Aled
[1] https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/1068
[2] https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/1069
On 02/12/2019 09:27, Aled Sage wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Ludo, all: - great list, and +1 from me.
I think most of those sound fairly small and manageable.
The one that stands out as potentially hard is the "Karaf version
bump" (which would fix the "Two different versions of jetty-server").
We've had problems in the past getting all versions consistent, and
karaf to start up fast and cleanly (without it restarting a bunch of
bundles). Changing the version is really easy - getting all versions
of all bundles to be consistent can be a pain! But it's worth doing.
Aled
On 01/12/2019 14:47, Geoff Macartney wrote:
We should definitely include
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-597 "Remove MD5 and SHA-1
checksums" as part of 1.0.0. I'd be happy to do this but I see it's got
you assigned to it Richard. Do you have work in progress on this, or
would
you like me to look into it? I have a notion that I might polish up the
signing procedure a bit.
Cheers
Geoff
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 14:13, Geoff Macartney <geoff.macart...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Ludo,
I am indeed pleased to see this! I had been thinking of mailing the
community again on the matter after Christmas was out of the way,
let's let
2020 be the year of Brooklyn 1.0.0!
That's a great list of things to address. One thing to add would be
removing some deprecated code. Do you think they are all small
changes, or
do any require extensive work or have a wide impact?
The reason I ask is that I think it would be good to restrict
ourselves to
relatively easy and limited impact changes between now and 1.0.0. My
fear
is that larger changes will take a longer time and push back a
release even
further. It seems to me things are quite stable now; I'd say let's
polish
it up and release it rather than try to make significant improvements.
What does everyone think?
Cheers
Geoff
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 11:04, Ludovic Farine <l...@cloudsoft.io> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hope you are all doing well!
Christmas is fast approaching and well hopefully a gift we would
all like
to have: Brooklyn 1.0.0 release :) Geoff would be pleased to hear!
Working towards this goal of first official release, these are a
few bug
fixes and improvements that I believe are worth considering
(non-exhaustive
and not ordered wishlist!) :
Bug fixes:
-
Broken icon links for ELK and DNS entities
-
REST API Swagger error
-
Two different versions of jetty-server
-
Karaf version bump
Improvements:
-
Session Management: introduce expiry settings for inactivity or
repeated
background API calls
-
User Experience: blueprints ordered by date deployed, cookies to
remember preferred sort criteria and palette preferences
Clean-up:
-
Review existing open Pull Requests
-
Fix most of the Jenkins tests
What are your thoughts on this scope? Any other suggestions you
would like
to deliver in this next release?
Looking forward to get the community engaging in the next weeks and
months.
Remember you can participate with others on the official Slack channel
*#brooklyn* on the official Apache group. Sign up here
https://s.apache.org/slack-invite to join the discussion!
Thanks
Ludo
--
Ludovic Farine
Senior Technical Project Manager
Cloudsoft <https://cloudsoft.io/> | Bringing Business to the Cloud
E: l...@cloudsoft.io
T: +44 7584 748013
L: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ludovicfarine/
