+1 Yeah, it looks OK to me, Richard. I think this fits with the Apache Way and won't be too difficult to get up and running with.
Andrew. -- -- andrew kennedy ? cloudsoft & software engineer : @grkvlt ; On 12 Jun 2014 12:29, "Richard Downer" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, all. > > Any further comments/votes on this? (mentors?) > > This has been open for best part of 72 hours now, so if no further > comments by Friday morning (UTC+1) I'll assume consensus and put this > into action. > > Cheers > Richard. > > > On 9 June 2014 23:39, Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > > > Following our earlier proposal for source code contributions using > > GitHub, here is a revised position which reflects our mentor's advice. > > > > TL;DR - it's similar to the last one, except that the normal working > > mirror will be https://github.com/apache/incubator-brooklyn, and no > > other GitHub organisations are involved. > > > > The process for contributors is described here: > > https://people.apache.org/~richard/community/how-to-contribute.html > > [Note that this URL is temporary, until docs go live at our official web > site] > > > > In short, contributors submit PRs against > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brooklyn, the remainder of the > > document describes some best practices and an explanation of the > > review process as a contributor would see it. > > > > The process for committers is described here: > > https://people.apache.org/~richard/community/committers.html > > [Note that this URL is temporary, until docs go live at our official web > site] > > > > This documents a workflow that involves setting up a local repository > > that refers to both the canonical Apache repository > > (https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-brooklyn.git) and > > the GitHub mirror, and describes how to merge pull requests from > > GitHub mirror and push them to the canonical repo. > > > > > > Any comments / votes? > > > > Thanks > > > > Richard. >
