Hi Aled, On 30 June 2014 19:09, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps the most controversial piece is the how to interpret the service > type. > > This type could potentially refer to something in the catalog, or to a java > class, or to a yaml file. > > To be explicit, we could support prepending these with "catalog:" or "java:" > or "yaml:".
Be explicit, IMO. *Possibly* make an exception for Java classes (that's how service type is always parsed at the moment, isn't it?) Autodetecting is a nice idea but can have ambiguity and require special cases - so my opinion is just to avoid that entirely.
