Hi all, do we also need to remove the @author from javadoc as I've seen in other apache projects? http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jclouds-dev/201406.mbox/%3C20140605170609.GA3566%40sherlock%3E
HTH, Andrea On 2 July 2014 12:58, Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Aled, > > I'm working on that list at the moment. The first priority was the > name of the release[1] > > Richard. > > [1]http://youtu.be/cywy4soWg2A > > On 2 July 2014 11:46, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > > > Richard, what is on the list of things we still need to do for an > > Apache-compliant release? > > > > Aled > > > > > > > > On 02/07/2014 11:42, Alex Heneveld wrote: > >> > >> > >> M2 ASAP and GA soon after. > >> > >> There are so many great new features! > >> > >> --A > >> > >> > >> On 02/07/2014 11:33, Richard Downer wrote: > >>> > >>> We should start thinking about making a release. It's an important > >>> milestone in incubation; there will also likely be quite a bit of > >>> working involved in getting our codebase and our procedures compliant > >>> to Apache standard, and will probably be one or two mis-steps along > >>> the way. So I would like to start planning our next release as soon as > >>> possible. We have also added several major new features recently and > >>> it would be great to get these out of SNAPSHOTs and into something > >>> that we can put on the front page of the website! > >>> > >>> The first question is what our next release would be. It could be > >>> 0.7.0-M2-incubating - or it could be a GA version, 0.7.0-incubating. > >>> > >>> While we've collectively made great progress towards our goals for a > >>> 0.7.0 GA, it may be better to give ourselves a bit of breathing space > >>> and commence with an M2 release. This means we can concentrate on > >>> getting a good Apache-compliant release, and save filling in the > >>> missing GA-required features until afterwards. > >>> > >>> What are peoples thoughts? > >>> > >>> Richard. > >> > >> > > >
