+1 binding

Gosling Von <[email protected]> 于2020年1月21日周二 下午2:33写道:

> Hi,
>
>
> Before vote +1, we must make clear that Category B license including in
> brpc. I found there is one paragraph said on the website[1]. I would like
> to leave my last vote on this issue :-)
>
>
> “ Unless otherwise specified, all Category B licensed works should be
> included in binary-only form in Apache Software Foundation convenience
> binaries (and not source code). "
>
>
> @Justin, Do we have any exception(Unless otherwise specified? ) to include
> b licenses in the source code?
>
> [1]  https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#weak-copyleft-licenses <
> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#weak-copyleft-licenses>.
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 19, 2020, at 5:20 PM, James Ge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding
> >
> > Solved issues (many thanks to Justin)
> > - Removed butil/memory/scoped_array.h which is replaceable by
> > unique_ptr<T[]>
> > - Removed butil/md5.cc butil/md5.h test/md5_unittest.cc which is
> > replaceable by openssl/md5.h
> > - Removed authors from headers
> > - Updated copyright years to this year
> > - Added appendix in LICENSE
> > - Added missing licenses in rapidjson/SVGPan/pprof_perl.cpp etc
> > - Replaced crc32 code(category X) in src/brpc/ts.cpp
> > - About the supporting function written by Dean Edwards in
> > ./src/brpc/builtin/sorttable_js.cpp: apache TrafficControl and spark also
> > include the same sortable.js and they only list the MIT licenses [1][2]
> >
> > Unsolved:
> > - flamegraph_perl(category B), used for displaying CPU/heap/contention
> > profiling results in framegraphs.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/blob/master/licenses/MIT-sorttable
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/LICENSE#L241
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:56 PM tan zhongyi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, guys,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 0.9.7-rc03 is ready for vote, here it is.
> >>
> >> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of  apache
> >> brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03.
> >>
> >> Btw: there is still some IP issues left, so we add  DISCLAIMER-WIP here.
> >>
> >>
> >> The source code can be found at:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc03/apache-brpc-0.9.7.rc03-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >>
> >>
> >> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc03, available
> >> here:
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc03
> >>
> >> The SHA-512 checksum is:
> >>
> >>
> 3852185929f8b242aacef5601acb85ab4b397584c515813f740effb1a9eabdba43eaccbe4b5eb1e6763f672fbb4a7937fe71a0dc4a240ef8891d413f30e9b257
> >>
> >>
> >> which can be found via:
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc03/apache-brpc-0.9.7.rc03-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha512
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The signature can be found via:
> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc03/apache-brpc-0.9.7.rc03-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> KEYS file is available here:
> >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [Release Note]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  *   Add DISCLAIMER-WIP as license issues are not all cleaned
> >>  *   Fix many license related issues
> >>  *   Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
> >>  *   Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
> >>  *   Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
> >>  *   Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
> >>  *   bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
> >>  *   String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
> >>  *   Support for bilibili discovery service
> >>  *   Improved CircuitBreaker
> >>  *   grpc impl. supports timeout
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Please vote on releasing this package as:
> >>
> >> Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This vote will be open until “Jan 19 2020 24:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and
> >>
> >> passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
> >>
> >> cast.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release this package
> >>
> >> [ ] 0  I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> >>
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers,
> please
> >>
> >> feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to