Re: [I] 是否可以直接执行Socket::StartWrite里的KeepWrite？ (brpc)

[via GitHub]

cbsheng commented on issue #2588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/brpc/issues/2588#issuecomment-2719652444

   补充最近我们生产环境遇到的一个 OOM Case 数据，该节点突然接收到较多的读数据请求。
   
   
![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/94afc43c-d13f-471c-a607-1ec3899b3c70)
   
   
![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82a57e9d-2643-4ccb-94af-8c8e82417184)
   
   
![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/44e501a7-4964-4a3b-aeb3-74269801a24c)
   
   
![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e182b25e-2f1f-40eb-bf84-ffade87b9d2e)
   
   
![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cfb1c38b-a0af-43b7-8d34-312a7c86e734)
   
   
![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b6ff081e-bdfb-41ed-9d9b-ff310eff4bd7)
   
   不清楚直接执行 keepwrite 在这个 case 里是否会更高效？
   另外这里的 bthread_switch 下降较大，是由于出现阻塞性的 bthread 还是因为 BRPC 服务得不到 CPU 
时间片（因为这台机器混布其它吃 CPU 服务）


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org