+1 for a release asap. we're using 1.3.4-snapshot everyday, it's stable enough to be released imho.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com> wrote: > I don't know how people feel about this specifically but I wouldn't mind > doing a 1.3.4 now and a 1.3.5 sooner with JRuby 1.2.0 support rather than > waiting longer for 1.3.4. > > More frequent releases can't be bad for the project at this point (with > moderation, of course) > > alex > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'm using Buildr on JRuby 1.2.0. Aside from the `system` issue and the > > need > > to install each of the dependent gems one at a time, everything works > just > > dandy. What problems are you seeing? > > > > Daniel > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Victor Hugo Borja <vic.bo...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > I'm sorry, I haven't had time to fix those jruby problems I had while > > > testing with jruby 1.2.0 on my local repo. But if no one else are > getting > > > those errors, please go for it. > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > The 1.3.4 release is now long overdue... Victor are you still > > > volunteering > > > > to do it? If not, I can get started tomorrow. > > > > > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > vic > > > > > > Quaerendo invenietis. > > > > > >
