On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com>wrote:
> The semi-official git repo for buildr is now at: > http://git.apache.org/ I think git.apache.org are now official mirrors of trunk, properly maintained by Apache. (although there's a lag until new commits show up) Assaf > <http://git.apache.org/> > > e.g. http://git.apache.org/buildr.git > > alex > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Ah, that would explain it! Considering that the GitHub repo is > referenced > > on the project page as an alternative way to get the source, we might > want > > to keep it up to date. Didn't Vic have a script back in the day to take > > care of this? > > > > Daniel > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Actually, the buildr/buildr repository at GitHub isn't syncing *at > all* > > > > with > > > > the SVN anymore. It's missing quite a few of the latest commits. > > > > > > > > > AFAIK it never synched, those were all manual pushes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I just noticed that the 1.3.4 release hasn't been tagged yet in > Git. > > > Did > > > > > something just not sync yet? > > > > > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
