Hi,
Thanks to both of you for the clarification. I'm including the
Intalio statement in NOTICE, too.
(I've pushed an initial version of the separated code to github[1].
I'll announce it on u...@buildr once there's an actual release.)
Thanks again,
Rhett
[1]: http://github.com/rsutphin/buildr-iidea
On Mar 23, 2010, at 8:09 PM, Shane Witbeck wrote:
Not sure if further clarification is needed but I contributed the
idea7x
task and it was closely derived from the original idea task.
-Shane
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]
>wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Rhett Sutphin <[email protected]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to release my version of Intellij IDEA project file
generation
as
a separate, MIT-licensed extension. (The idea is that this will
allow it
to
vary independent of buildr itself, so that changes/fixes won't
have to be
reviewed by the non-IDEA-using committer group and so that it can
release
new features on its own schedule.) It was originally based on the
idea7x
task, so I want to make sure that I'm obeying the apache license.
I believe the only part of the NOTICE file I need to include is
this:
Apache Buildr
Copyright 2007-2009 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
Is that correct? Or would any of the other copyright notices
apply to
idea7x?
I believe you would also need to include the Intalio copyright from
NOTICE
since I'm pretty certain the idea7x task was written, or at least
derived
from, the original contribution from Intalio. (git log on idea7x.rb
doesn't go beyond 2008).
alex
