I haven't looked at the details and the ChangeLog is rather evasive;  were
there any fixes since RJB 1.2.0 that would help with MRI + JDK6?

alex

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Antoine Toulme <[email protected]>wrote:

> The CI build passed with RJB 1.2.5.
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 14:38, Daniel Spiewak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Once we're set, I think we should do another quick RC given the fact that
> > our dependencies (RJB) have changed.  If everyone's builds work, then we
> may
> > actually be good to go!
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Antoine Toulme <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Our four builds are now green. I am updating RJB to the latest version
> as
> >> it
> >> comes with some useful fixes and hopefully more stability.
> >> Then all-in-one and release.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 23:59, Tal Rotbart <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Nice!
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Antoine Toulme <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > We now have 4 official CI builds polling hourly the SVN for changes:
> >> > >
> >> > > * JRuby ubuntu:
> >> > > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/buildr-ci-build-jruby
> >> > > * JRuby ubuntu jdk5:
> >> > >
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/buildr-ci-build-jruby-jdk5
> >> > > * MRI Ubuntu:
> >> > > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Buildr-ci-build/
> >> > > * JRuby Win32:
> >> > >
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Buildr-ci-build-jruby-win32
> >> > >
> >> > > We now use ci_reporter, which means going forward we will have a
> >> history
> >> > of
> >> > > our failed tests.
> >> > > Here is the current graph for one of our builds:
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Buildr-ci-build-jruby/19/testReport/history/
> >> > >
> >> > > I will implement a MRI build over Win32 and we will be all set for a
> >> > basic
> >> > > harness. I also will add rubinius.
> >> > >
> >> > > Now the best part: all CI builds are green except for the win32 one,
> >> > which
> >> > > has one failure over scala.
> >> > >
> >> > > I hope you like it. I certainly do!
> >> > >
> >> > > Antoine
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to